Canada passes law to protect whistleblowers and journalists’ confidential sources
This Vice news article explains how the Canadian government passed a new protective law that shields journalists and their anonymous sources from search warrants and police surveillance.
In my opinion, protecting the anonymity of sources is quite important. Their jobs or sometimes even their lives may be in jeopardy if their names are exposed to the public. so protecting their identity is something of the utmost importance. As well, journalists can now uncover the dirty details of a case without the threat of being harassed by the police. They'll be able to uncover anything unjust that goes on behind closed doors of the government and big companies.
The Journalistic Source Protection Act, also known as Bill S-231, was first introduced in November 2016 after news broke that Quebec and Montreal police had been spying on journalists to find the sources of leaks. The new bill amends the Canada Evidence Act and allows journalists the right to refuse to disclose information or documents that may identify a source that has asked for anonymity. Under the new law, security agencies will only be granted search warrants or production orders for a journalist’s source material if a judge decides there’s no other ‘reasonable’ way for them to get it or if the importance of the investigation outweighs the public interest of protecting a journalistic source. As well, if a judge does approve a search warrant for a journalist's information law enforcement will have to meet the same criteria in order to be able to examine, reproduce or make copies of the seized material.
This topic relates to journalism because now journalists will be a lot safer when reporting on controversial stories. As well, the public will be more informed of important issues, and journalists will feel more comfortable when reporting the gritty, dirty truth. Sources might become much more reliable and open when giving journalists information as they know that the possibility of the police finding out who the source was is much slimmer now. The new law might raise issues for journalists because he police might be less co-operative with the journalists now.
This Vice news article explains how the Canadian government passed a new protective law that shields journalists and their anonymous sources from search warrants and police surveillance.
In my opinion, protecting the anonymity of sources is quite important. Their jobs or sometimes even their lives may be in jeopardy if their names are exposed to the public. so protecting their identity is something of the utmost importance. As well, journalists can now uncover the dirty details of a case without the threat of being harassed by the police. They'll be able to uncover anything unjust that goes on behind closed doors of the government and big companies.
The Journalistic Source Protection Act, also known as Bill S-231, was first introduced in November 2016 after news broke that Quebec and Montreal police had been spying on journalists to find the sources of leaks. The new bill amends the Canada Evidence Act and allows journalists the right to refuse to disclose information or documents that may identify a source that has asked for anonymity. Under the new law, security agencies will only be granted search warrants or production orders for a journalist’s source material if a judge decides there’s no other ‘reasonable’ way for them to get it or if the importance of the investigation outweighs the public interest of protecting a journalistic source. As well, if a judge does approve a search warrant for a journalist's information law enforcement will have to meet the same criteria in order to be able to examine, reproduce or make copies of the seized material.
This topic relates to journalism because now journalists will be a lot safer when reporting on controversial stories. As well, the public will be more informed of important issues, and journalists will feel more comfortable when reporting the gritty, dirty truth. Sources might become much more reliable and open when giving journalists information as they know that the possibility of the police finding out who the source was is much slimmer now. The new law might raise issues for journalists because he police might be less co-operative with the journalists now.
Comments
Post a Comment