Skip to main content

Starting With the Basics



Saudi Women Will be Allowed to Drive in 2018

         This past Tuesday, September 26th, 2017, the country of Saudi Arabia lifted a 32-year ban on women drivers in the country. CTV news reports that the decision comes after three decades of campaigning from activist to lift the misogynistic ban. Activists said on Wednesday that the decision is just one on a long list for demanding equality in the country. Saudi Arabia was the only country in the world that barred women from driving, women often faced arrest for their protests and for getting behind the wheel. The lifting of the ban, which comes into effect next summer, is the most dramatic step yet in a campaign by the king's son, 32-year-old Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, to modernize the kingdom. The young royal has been promoting change as needed to boost the country's economy and ease international criticism, but he risks a backlash from powerful clerics from the ultraconservative Wahhabi interpretation of Islam. Saudi Arabian woman's rights activist, Sahar Nasief had this to say about the ban being lifted "I am very optimistic about the future," she said. "Things have to change. People are demanding it. Young people don't want to live the way we lived. They want to live better. They want to live how other people are living."

            CTV news' lead for this story is informative and leaves the reader curious without revealing too much about the contents of the article. The most relevant information is presented first, that being that the ban is being lifted and the reasons why. The article then goes into the history of the woman's rights movement regarding the driving ban. The story ends on a high note, with a quote from a well-known activist on her hopes for the future of women's rights in the country. A link to the news article can be found here.



Duchess of Cambridge Pregnant With Third Child

         On September 5th, 2017 the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge announced that they are expecting their third child. They made the announcement early, as, with her two previous pregnancies, Kate is suffering from hyperemesis gravidarum, which involves nausea and vomiting more severe than the typical morning sickness many women suffer during early pregnancy. The article states that regardless of whether the child is a boy or a girl, the baby will become the fifth in line to the throne behind big sister Charlotte, bumping Prince Harry down the line of succession.

          CNN's lead for this story is straightforward, stating the fact of the article first, then goes into more detail about the pregnancy and the royals. I think it is effective to those who just skim over the titles of articles. The most important information is told first, that being the Duchess is suffering from hyperemesis gravidarum. It then goes into details about the Duke and Duchess and their lives. A quote from Buckingham Palace reads "Their Royal Highnesses The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are very pleased to announce that The Duchess of Cambridge is expecting their third child." The story ends on a note unrelated to the announcement, talking about the Duke's job, which in the context of the article isn't very effective. A link to the article can be found here.
























Link

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Caught In Lies: Jimmy's World and the Wafer Caper

     Though not as often as I should, I have considered that the news I'm exposed to may be factually incorrect, and I like to think that I'm good at checking sources to know if something is true or not. I don't consider myself to be someone who blindly believes anything they see on the internet. Most of the time I check the source because I don't want to seem dumb for believing something that was fake.       My reaction to the "Wafer caper" as I will be referring to the article about two senior staff members of the Telegraph Journal getting fired over a fake news story was that of shock and a bit of humor. The original story about Harper putting the wafer in his pocket isn't exactly the hardest hitting news story I've seen, and the fact that the paper had to lie about it to run the story is funny to me. Just the fact that it was all fake is a shock to me because didn't anyone bother to fact check before the story was published? The fake story abo

Hard News vs. Soft News

Hard News: At least 54 killed in Egypt after police operation ambushed      I believe this article would be considered "hard news" because nothing is sugar-coated. The article states cold hard facts about the story and doesn't beat around the bush with anything. This story isn't meant to entertain the reader, but to provide facts about the attack. The article is informative and gives insight into what is happening in Egypt, and while it may not be in the human interest to see this story, it needs to be told. Soft News: Taiwan Police Department's Newest Recruits are Sleeping on the Job      This article would definitely be considered "soft news" because its purpose is to entertain the reader with a lighthearted cute story about the puppies joining the department. The headline of the story leads the reader to believe the story will be about actual officers but leaves them pleasantly surprised. It also provides some very cute pictures of the "recruits

Journal Entry #1 The First Newspaper.

There are some very obvious differences between newspapers today, and the very first newspapers. Not only have the design and layout of the papers changed, but also the content is very different. There are now things like obituaries, comic sections, and we get to enjoy everything in color. The very first newspaper,  Publick Occurrences  was written by Benjamin Harris as a way to inform the public of the misdoings of the government. Now it has moved away from that and has lots of information about local and national news, events and much more. Today online, you can watch news videos, or just turn on the television and see whats going on. You couldn't do that in 1690. I don't think the government should have power to shut down newspapers or news stations because it is our right as citizens to have an in depth knowledge of what s going on in our communities, our country and our world. We should be able to go to news outlets in order to get an unbiased look and current events. If